Re: [boost] interest on a geometry library

From: rodolfo_at_[hidden]
Date: 2006-03-18 12:34:26

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 10:03:10AM -0000, Andy Little wrote:
> 
> "Geoffrey Irving" <irving_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:20060317182700.GG9842_at_lie.Stanford.EDU...
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:09:26PM -0300, rodolfo_at_[hidden] wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:17:53AM -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
> >> > Is it reasonable to extend the logic to check for 3D shapes (i.e.,
> >> > spheres instead of circles, etc.)?
> >> >
> >> > It certainly would be a reasonable strategy to get the 2D work you have
> >> > into the library and treat 3D as a later extension.
> 
> In my own work on this I used two namespaces "geometry::two_d" and
> "geometry::three_d".
> (I shall put what I have in the vault). I or someone could create a Geometry
> folder ...?

A place in the vault to share some ideas is welcome. How do we do that?

Rodolfo Lima

                
_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com