From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-25 11:06:55
Neal Becker wrote:
> 1. Generic data types instead of hard-coded 'double'
Hmm, generic? int's won't make any sense would they?
perhaps double or float but what else?
> 3. Does support of complex make any sense here?
I would rather like to see multivalued functions.
But complex of course could also turn out to be handy at times.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk