From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-29 19:22:16
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> I don't see why Peter is the only one who seems to be responding to
>>>> the auto_ptr rvalue implicit conversion technique. It just works.
>> BTW, I forgot to mention that new_ is a great idea! :)
> Thanks. The question now is whether this facility should be adopted
> by the smart pointer library or not, and that's up to Peter. If not,
> it will need a separate review.
We need documentation and tests as a first step. :-) (Regardless of whether
new.hpp ends up in Smart_ptr or Utility.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk