From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-29 22:19:30
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>> I don't see why Peter is the only one who seems to be responding to
>>>>> the auto_ptr rvalue implicit conversion technique. It just works.
>>> BTW, I forgot to mention that new_ is a great idea! :)
>> Thanks. The question now is whether this facility should be adopted
>> by the smart pointer library or not, and that's up to Peter. If not,
>> it will need a separate review.
> We need documentation and tests as a first step. :-) (Regardless of whether
> new.hpp ends up in Smart_ptr or Utility.)
Yes, but if it's going to go into Smart_ptr we need those things
So I'm still asking. I can _request_ a review, if necessary, without
having written the tests and docs. But I'd rather not do it that way.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk