From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-31 04:20:33
"Tom Brinkman" wrote
> If you would like us to make any modifications or additions to this
> report before we do that, please email Ron or Tom.
I'd like to make a correction on this
Hopefully the PQS review info below helps in the clarification...
> Physical Quantities System
> :Author: Andy Little
> :Review Manager: Need Volunteer
> PQS (Physical Quantities System) is used for modelling
> in C++ programs. The advantages over using built-in types in the role
> include: trapping errors in dimensional analysis, detailed semantic
> specifications for reliable and repeatable conversions between units and
> self-documentation of source code. PQS is based around the principles
> guidelines of the International System of Units (SI). The library
> a large number of quantities, physical and maths constants using a
> syntax. The library also includes (or will soon include) classes for
> manipulating quantities algebraically, for example angles (radians,
> steradians, degrees,minutes,seconds) and vectors, matrices and
> for more advanced modelling of physical systems.
> Libraries under development
> Geometry Library - Author - Andy Little (?)
To clarify ...
My current plans are to develop a geometry library for/within the PQS library
described above, rather than as a standalone effort. ( I will try to get some
preliminary code for this into the next version of PQS (pqs_3_0_7), and
hopefully that will
help to clarify how/why/if a geometry library for Quantities (or possibly
arbitrary UDT's) needs to differ from a classical geometry library. In brief;
allowing quantities rather than assuming numeric types affects the interface and
adds a burden on the implementation. My guess is that mathematicians would,
quite reasonably, find that unacceptable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk