Re: [boost] namespace naming -- the question to moderators

From: Jeff Flinn (TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-06 16:17:07

Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>>
>> This kind of unnamed namespace can be handled correctly by both MS
>> compilers, with respect to pch, but I don't believe it satisfies the
>> Boost naming convention.  OTOH, if no other solution is found, this
>> is the only way we can achieve typeof compliance with pch, while
>> still staying in the unnamed namespace.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> MPL introduces a namespace called "::mpl_" (note: root namespace) by

FYI: IIRC, there was a recent post where explicit leading "::" in refering 
to namespaces caused problems in atleast one compiler. I don't remember the 
exact problem, but I think it was a version of borland.

Jeff Flinn