From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-07 01:25:11
Jeff Flinn wrote:
> Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>>Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>>>This kind of unnamed namespace can be handled correctly by both MS
>>>compilers, with respect to pch, but I don't believe it satisfies the
>>>Boost naming convention. OTOH, if no other solution is found, this
>>>is the only way we can achieve typeof compliance with pch, while
>>>still staying in the unnamed namespace.
>>MPL introduces a namespace called "::mpl_" (note: root namespace) by
> FYI: IIRC, there was a recent post where explicit leading "::" in refering
> to namespaces caused problems in atleast one compiler.
Actually I thought I'd be talking to human beings rather than a compiler, here ;-).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk