Re: [boost] Sealed C++ class (why this inheritance is virtual - no-derivation article)

From: Vladislav Lazarenko (snail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-07 12:55:09

Arturo_Cuebas_at_[hidden] wrote:
> I thought I saw this before, so I looked it up and thought I would reply
> with a
> link to where I saw it.  I'll leave it up to you to decide whether this
> contributes at all to the discussion.
> http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#no-derivation
> 

Great article, thank you. As written there - "Unfortunately, that solution is 
not pretty.". The solution provided there is really not so pretty, but now we 
have pretty one.