From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-10 07:08:42
"Maxim Yegorushkin" <maxim.yegorushkin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On 4/10/06, Phil Nash <phil.nash.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > True. Boost have long ignored these issues, no wonder they accepted it
>> > tentatively.
>> The thing is, lexical_cast in its current implementation, is simple and
>> elegant, and perfectly usable for most cases.
> In the real world practicality beats purity. The fact is people do not
> use boost::lexical_cast because of the aforementioned problems.
Last time I looked, four out of five end-users in the "Who's using Boost"
section reported using lexical_cast. So it might be more accurate to say
"_some_ people do not use lexical_cast" .
The LWG is aware of those issues. That is the sort of thing they often
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk