Re: [boost] [FYI] RCF 0.2

From: Jarl Lindrud (jlindrud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-10 07:11:59

Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe.m.almeida <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Wouldnt this be possible?
> 
> std::string foo(std::string);
> 
> rcf::server s(endpoint);
> rcf::binder<std::string(std::string)> echo(&foo);
> 
> int main()
> {
>   s.register("IEcho", echo);
>   server.run(); // blocks
>   return;
> }
> 

It certainly is possible, and it's something I want to implement, but as you say 
it doesn't cover the case where you want to expose an interface consisting of 
several functions.

> Yes, what I wanted to say(but forgot to) is that RCF could use it. As
> it could use shmem and asio for IPC. That would make rcf with a
> cleaner interface.
> BTW, I dont like very much the RCF namespace all in caps, it seems
> like a macro. But that's just an aesthetic issue.

Yeah, Rcf:: would be better. I've just gotten so used to the caps that I don't 
see them :)

Regards,

Jarl