Re: [boost] Report from Berlin C++ Standards Committee meeting

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-11 14:58:26

Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>>   optional<T> string_to<T>(x)
>> 
>> seems more likely.
>
> Yes, looks good.
> What is the status of optional<T> w.r.t to the standard, anyway? I hope 
> it's on its way...

Same old story.  Write a proposal, please.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com