From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-11 08:20:58
David Abrahams wrote:
> optional<T> string_to<T>(x)
> seems more likely.
Yes, looks good.
What is the status of optional<T> w.r.t to the standard, anyway? I hope
it's on its way...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk