Boost logo

Boost :

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-14 05:47:57


Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> writes:

> That's bad news, since all Shmem/Interprocess POSIX synchronization is
> based on that. In windows I try to emulate it with spins and waits but
> that's really a pain because you don't get mutex benefits like priority
> inversion.

I don't know the details of what you're trying to do, but on Windows, native
synchronization objects can be shared between processes if you name them ---
if any process then requests the object with the same name, they get the same
mutex/semaphore/event.

HTH,

Anthony

-- 
Anthony Williams
Software Developer
Just Software Solutions Ltd
http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk