Re: [boost] metacomm borland 5_8_* results

From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-17 10:17:32

Peter Dimov wrote:
[...]
> Patches that insert an additional BOOST_WORKAROUND or fix the version of an 
> existing one should be relatively safe to make "by default" if nobody 
> objects within, say, 3 days or so. (I should note that your last patch 
> didn't fall into that category, though, IIRC.) 

Which one are you referring to?

Cheers,
Nicola Musatti