Re: [boost] [bug] typo in type_with_alignment.hpp

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-20 05:31:29

> template<std::size_t TAlign, std::size_t Align>
> struct is_aligned
> {
>   BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool,
>       value = (TAlign >= Align) & (TAlign % Align == 0)
>                                ^^^ <<---- here!
>       );
> };
>
> Should it be "&&" instead of "&"?

Logically yes: however when you think about it, it actually makes no 
practical difference, and I believe it was done that way deliberately as a 
workaround for certain broken compilers that choke on logical expressions 
"&&" inside integral constant expressions.  So for now I'm going to leave it 
alone.

John.