Re: [boost] [Boost Review] Property Tree Library

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 03:48:33

Marcin Kalicinski wrote:

> 
>>> XML itself may not have a notion of inclusions,
>>
>> It has more than a notion of includes, there's a whole spec:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/
>>
>> We use this all the time in BoostBook xml docs -- example from the
>> date_time
>> docs...
>>
>>   <xi:include href="conceptual.xml"/>
>>   <xi:include href="usage_examples.xml"/>
>>   <xi:include href="gregorian.xml"/>
> 
> It seems XML is even more complicated I thought it is, then ;-)
> If this is standard, it may be quite easy to implement includes in XML
> parser.

So, are you gonna roll namespace-aware XML parser? This is not trivial
either, since there are things like default namespace and so on.

- Volodya