|
Boost : |
From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 10:56:49
"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:e2a1p5$5he$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
>
> "Andy Little" wrote
>>
>>Did you consider a generic tree design? If so
>> why did you reject it in favour of this one?
>
> Just to refresh... The above is the most interesting and yet unanswered
> question
> about property tree for me. Am I missing something? Is this a silly
> question? Is
> it too trivial to answer?
IMO the same result (as library presents) could be achieved just by using
multi_index.
Gennadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk