From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 14:35:35
On 4/21/06, Jorge Lodos <lodos_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The way I see it, PT is the serialization library plus in-memory property
> storage. Perhaps it could have used serialization internally and
> serialization archives for loading and saving. As I said before, the real
> difference could be the loading and saving of some of the properties in the
> memory storage, without having to load/save them all.
I think you are correct here. This really sounds like it could've
(should've?) been implemented using the serialization library and
maybe BGL or a generic tree structure (which I would love to be a
That way you get all of the traversal mechanisms available to the tree
(or graph) structure, and all of the archiving techniques available to
the serialization lib.