Re: [boost] [Boost Review] Property Tree Library

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 16:03:10

"Michael Fawcett" <michael.fawcett_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:bc5bffe80604211135l41c2ecacx18105b56aa0689e8_at_mail.gmail.com...
> On 4/21/06, Jorge Lodos <lodos_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The way I see it, PT is the serialization library plus in-memory property
>> storage. Perhaps it could have used serialization internally and
>> serialization archives for loading and saving. As I said before, the real
>> difference could be the loading and saving of some of the properties in 
>> the
>> memory storage, without having to load/save them all.
>
> I think you are correct here.  This really sounds like it could've
> (should've?) been implemented using the serialization library and
> maybe BGL or a generic tree structure (which I would love to be a
> Boost library).
>
> That way you get all of the traversal mechanisms available to the tree
> (or graph) structure, and all of the archiving techniques available to
> the serialization lib.

Exactly my point.

Gennadiy