Boost logo

Boost :

From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 19:16:27

>>>Did you consider a generic tree design? If so
>>>why did you reject it in favour of this one?

> Along those lines, I have regularly used an open source
> implementation of a generic tree structure that I have come to dearly
> love: the forest class from the Adobe Source Library <http://
>>. If it's not
> terribly overreaching, I humbly suggest that adobe::forest would be a
> good model for boost to adopt as a generic tree structure.

Someone else mentioned this and I just skimmed the tutorial, and it
looks good. And my smile gets even bigger when I see the license (MIT)
is boost-compatible.

Instead of muttering about lack of boost::tree I'll give this a try next
time I need a tree structure.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at