From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 19:16:27
>>>Did you consider a generic tree design? If so
>>>why did you reject it in favour of this one?
> Along those lines, I have regularly used an open source
> implementation of a generic tree structure that I have come to dearly
> love: the forest class from the Adobe Source Library <http://
> opensource.adobe.com/group__forest__related.html>. If it's not
> terribly overreaching, I humbly suggest that adobe::forest would be a
> good model for boost to adopt as a generic tree structure.
Someone else mentioned this and I just skimmed the tutorial, and it
looks good. And my smile gets even bigger when I see the license (MIT)
Instead of muttering about lack of boost::tree I'll give this a try next
time I need a tree structure.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk