From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-22 13:53:15
I took another look at the library this morning and I agree with Jeff
that this library has potential.
Howewver, it is hard to get my head around this
library becouse it contains two very
different things: 1) a recursive property-tree container and
2) six parsers to populate this container.
I'm not a low-level container author so I cant speak to the
merits pro/con of this implementation of a recursive property-tree.
Nevertheless, I would like the review to focus on this, without regard to
the parser grammers.
I think that my objections could be resolved by removing the six-parsers
from the review. Assuming the "property-tree" container is approved,
lets schedule another review for these six-parsers. Either all of them at
once, or one at a time.
If the library author would be willing to delay the review the parser
grammers until later this year, I might be persuaded to give this library
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk