From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-24 08:33:57
Daniel Wesslén wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>>When boost gets a full XML library then the property_tree XML parser
>>>could (should, IMO) be replaced with a wrapper over that one. What's the
>>There is no need for that. As long as the scope of the xml-parser for
>>a property tree is well-defined wrt. what subset of xml it can handle,
>>the user is free to choose.
>>It is not obvious how more advanced xml-features should map to a
>>property-tree, and it is quite thinkable that it does not make much
>>sense to use those together.
> Schema validation, XInclude and encodings could be transparently
> supported. Sure, some advanced features wouldn't map neatly to a
> property_tree, but that is no reason to rule out support for those that do.
I'm not qualified enough to reply to those claims.
But let's use this sub-thread to discuss the scope of the xml-parser.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk