Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-24 11:19:43

"bwood" <brass_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>: "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> :>"Ivan Vecerina" <ivec_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> :> It's not like boost::serialize currently dominates the world
> :> of persistent storage.
> :
> :So? I see a potencial for it to become a standard like iostreams now.
> I'm glad you added the part about iostreams as I think it hits the
> nail on the head. I agree with Andrei's opinions of iostreams.
> /86a5a3f804c84ea4/48842ae2fd029ce6?hl=en#48842ae2fd029ce6

I don't have time to read through this huge thread regarding garbage
collection to search for iostreams related staff, but after his recent
"performace" in printf article I wouldn't value his opinion in I/O domain
that much.

> While iostreams is a part of the standard that doesn't mean it
> is a healthy part of it. I think eventually someone will
> develop something better.

Let's see. Meanwhile I believe iostreams satisfy most of potencial users in
target domain.

> You've been touting multi_index here as well.

Not at all. If you follow my recent concern with multi_index design I
actually believe it's lacking.

> I wouldn't balk if you suggested adding it to the standard.

I wouldn't be suggesting anything but I wouldn't balk if somebody will.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at