From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-24 11:19:43
"bwood" <brass_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>: "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> :>"Ivan Vecerina" <ivec_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> :> It's not like boost::serialize currently dominates the world
> :> of persistent storage.
> :So? I see a potencial for it to become a standard like iostreams now.
> I'm glad you added the part about iostreams as I think it hits the
> nail on the head. I agree with Andrei's opinions of iostreams.
I don't have time to read through this huge thread regarding garbage
collection to search for iostreams related staff, but after his recent
"performace" in printf article I wouldn't value his opinion in I/O domain
> While iostreams is a part of the standard that doesn't mean it
> is a healthy part of it. I think eventually someone will
> develop something better.
Let's see. Meanwhile I believe iostreams satisfy most of potencial users in
> You've been touting multi_index here as well.
Not at all. If you follow my recent concern with multi_index design I
actually believe it's lacking.
> I wouldn't balk if you suggested adding it to the standard.
I wouldn't be suggesting anything but I wouldn't balk if somebody will.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk