Re: [boost] [Boost Review] Do property_tree and program_optionsoverlap?

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrei_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 14:37:43

[Apologies if this appears multiple times. Apparently I can't use an 
invalid email address anymore, and that's caused a number of problems 
with my account.]

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
 > "bwood" <brass_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:20060423224436.A5D61B6554B_at_gateway.mailvault.com...
 >> : "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
 >> :>"Ivan Vecerina" <ivec_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
 >>
 >> :> It's not like boost::serialize currently dominates the world
 >> :> of persistent storage.
 >> :
 >> :So? I see a potencial for it to become a standard like iostreams now.
 >>
 >> I'm glad you added the part about iostreams as I think it hits the
 >> nail on the head.  I agree with Andrei's opinions of iostreams.
 >>
 >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_frm/thread
 >> /86a5a3f804c84ea4/48842ae2fd029ce6?hl=en#48842ae2fd029ce6
 >
 > I don't have time to read through this huge thread regarding garbage 
collection to search for iostreams related staff, but after his recent 
"performace" in printf article I wouldn't value his opinion in I/O 
domain that much.

Ouch. What did I do? I'd be glad to hear any criticism. If this is 
off-topic in this group, feel free to use comp.lang.c++.moderated 
instead. Thanks!

Andrei