Boost logo

Boost :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 03:29:38

Boris Gubenko wrote:
>> From tests results on metacomm web site, it seems to me, that some
>> platforms are using Boost.Build v1 while others are using v2.
> For being certified as a supported compiler in 1.34 release, is it
> a requirement to use Boost.Build v2?

The plan is to use V2 for 1.34, but I have no idea if it's a requirement.
Both HP CXX versions under test already use V2.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at