From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 11:02:33
Boris Gubenko wrote:
>>From tests results on metacomm web site, it seems to me, that some
> platforms are using Boost.Build v1 while others are using v2.
> For being certified as a supported compiler in 1.34 release, is it
> a requirement to use Boost.Build v2?
That is the current plan.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk