Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 11:02:33

Next message: Spencer Collyer: "Re: [boost] Possible class submission: Sparse Array"
Previous message: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [RC 1.34 / Merge Request]"
In reply to: Boris Gubenko: "[boost] is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?"
Next in thread: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]"
Reply: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]"

Boris Gubenko wrote:
>>From tests results on metacomm web site, it seems to me, that some
> platforms are using Boost.Build v1 while others are using v2.
>
> For being certified as a supported compiler in 1.34 release, is it
> a requirement to use Boost.Build v2?

That is the current plan.

Thomas

Release Manager

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]

Next message: Spencer Collyer: "Re: [boost] Possible class submission: Sparse Array"
Previous message: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [RC 1.34 / Merge Request]"
In reply to: Boris Gubenko: "[boost] is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?"
Next in thread: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]"
Reply: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "[boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk