Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 11:02:00

Next message: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?"
Previous message: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] Compilation problem :Regex"
In reply to: Markus Schöpflin: "[boost] [RC 1.34 / Merge Request] (was: Re: [bind] bind_visit_test failure on GCC 4.1.0 and HP/CXX)"
Next in thread: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [bind] bind_visit_test failure on GCC 4.1.0 and HP/CXX"

Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>>> It does, thanks. This is a bug in boost::bind that is exposed by two-phase
>>> lookup. I fixed it in CVS HEAD. Not sure yet what to do with the 1.34 branch
>>> as changes in boost::bind have a potential to break other things.
>> As it's a bug fix it should be merged IMO. But it's on the release manager
>> to decide, of course.
>
> Could the review manager please comment on this?

Please go ahead and merge it.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]

Next message: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?"
Previous message: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] Compilation problem :Regex"
In reply to: Markus Schöpflin: "[boost] [RC 1.34 / Merge Request] (was: Re: [bind] bind_visit_test failure on GCC 4.1.0 and HP/CXX)"
Next in thread: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [bind] bind_visit_test failure on GCC 4.1.0 and HP/CXX"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk