Re: [boost] 1.34 schedule status [was: Re: is it a requirement to use V2 for 1.34 release?]

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-27 22:00:06

Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
>> 
>> Thomas Witt ha escrito:
>> 
>>> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>>>> >From tests results on metacomm web site, it seems to me, that some
>>>> platforms are using Boost.Build v1 while others are using v2.
>>>>
>>>> For being certified as a supported compiler in 1.34 release, is it
>>>> a requirement to use Boost.Build v2?
>>> That is the current plan.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> Release Manager
>> 
>> Hello Thomas, regarding the release procedure, is there any
>> tentative scheduling, or are we stuck due to SF CVS outage
>> or any other external factor?
>
> I'd also like to know what the release schedule is. I need to do another 
> bjam release for BBv2 to work out of the box when the release happens 
> before then, and I want to know if I need to do it in the next 2 days 
> before a vacation. Or if I can do it after the vacation a week and a 
> half later :-)

I'm guessing we'll need that week and a half to finish the
documentation updates for the Parameter library and Boost.Python. :(

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com