Re: [boost] [Boost Review] Do property_tree andprogram_optionsoverlap?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-28 11:19:12

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrei_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:e2r31o$29s$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> [Apologies if this appears multiple times. Apparently I can't use an
> invalid email address anymore, and that's caused a number of problems
> with my account.]
>
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > "bwood" <brass_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:20060423224436.A5D61B6554B_at_gateway.mailvault.com...
> >> : "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> >> :>"Ivan Vecerina" <ivec_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> >>
> >> :> It's not like boost::serialize currently dominates the world
> >> :> of persistent storage.
> >> :
> >> :So? I see a potencial for it to become a standard like iostreams now.
> >>
> >> I'm glad you added the part about iostreams as I think it hits the
> >> nail on the head.  I agree with Andrei's opinions of iostreams.
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_frm/thread
> >> /86a5a3f804c84ea4/48842ae2fd029ce6?hl=en#48842ae2fd029ce6
> >
> > I don't have time to read through this huge thread regarding garbage
> collection to search for iostreams related staff, but after his recent
> "performace" in printf article I wouldn't value his opinion in I/O
> domain that much.
>
> Ouch. What did I do? I'd be glad to hear any criticism. If this is
> off-topic in this group, feel free to use comp.lang.c++.moderated
> instead. Thanks!
>
> Andrei

Sorry, Andrei. I am really busy at the moment. I will need to dig out the 
article in CUJ to answer specifically. But I remember I was really 
disappointed at the time. I will try to reply soon.

Regards,

Gennadiy