From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-30 11:49:20
Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:21:40 -0700, Robert Ramey wrote
>> Hmm - I couldn't resist adding my own idea for an add on to
>> Robert Ramey
> Actually, I think that serialization extensions would be great student
> projects. It's real, it's meaty and it's increadibly useful.
> In fact, I might suggest we go for JSON (http://www.json.org/) or YAML
> (http://www.yaml.org/) instead of another XML binding.
FWIW I was thinking of leaving the same XML but just generating a parallel
schema which could be used by an XML editor. From the posts
on the property tree discussion I realize that there would be interest
in this. On the other hand, it would require a lot of interest in
becoming familiar with arcane details of current state of the art
XML. I'm sure this is very hot topic and of much interest to
some people but not to me. So, that's my true motivation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk