From: JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-01 15:21:42
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]>
Fecha: Lunes, Mayo 1, 2006 6:43 pm
Asunto: Re: [boost] [Boost Review] Do property_tree and program_options
> "bwood" <brass_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > I read those and was sympathetic to the terminology
> > arguments you made. L?pez Mu?oz believes it is too late
> > to make those sort of changes. I disagree with him on that,
> > but it isn't clear enough yet to me what would be better
> > terminology. I didn't follow the other matter you raised
> > in those posts.
> My point was that we need another level of indirection an in-Order
> (along with different orders for the same data).
It'd be great if you can resume that discussion of ours
where we left:
This last response I sent on Apr 20th, after some
inactivity days, so maybe you just didn't notice it.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk