From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-03 14:17:31
On May 3, 2006, at 3:44 AM, Nicola Musatti wrote:
> Hallo, Doug.
> The attached patch for signal_test.cpp enables the alternative
> syntax for the Borland compilers as they still do not support the
> standard one.
> I realize that this in itself could be considered a reason for the
> test to fail. What do you think? Maybe this patch could be applied
> to the RC_1_34_0 branch only and not to head.
Actually, this test is intended to fail on compilers that don't
support the standard syntax. It should be identical to signal_n_test,
which uses the more portable, alternative syntax. So, I'd rather not
apply this patch. We should instead mark this as an expected failure
in the regression test results.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk