From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-03 15:01:44
Doug Gregor wrote:
>>I realize that this in itself could be considered a reason for the
>>test to fail. What do you think? Maybe this patch could be applied
>>to the RC_1_34_0 branch only and not to head.
> Actually, this test is intended to fail on compilers that don't
> support the standard syntax. It should be identical to signal_n_test,
> which uses the more portable, alternative syntax. So, I'd rather not
> apply this patch. We should instead mark this as an expected failure
> in the regression test results.
Fine by me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk