Re: [boost] [signals] Test patch for BCB2006

From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-03 15:01:44

Doug Gregor wrote:
[...]
>>I realize that this in itself could be considered a reason for the  
>>test to fail. What do you think? Maybe this patch could be applied  
>>to the RC_1_34_0 branch only and not to head.
> 
> Actually, this test is intended to fail on compilers that don't  
> support the standard syntax. It should be identical to signal_n_test,  
> which uses the more portable, alternative syntax. So, I'd rather not  
> apply this patch. We should instead mark this as an expected failure  
> in the regression test results.

Fine by me.

Cheers,
Nicola Musatti