Boost logo

Boost :

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-07 10:42:21

Hi again,

It would be very cool if fusion::pair would be compatible with mpl::pair, so that MPL's "first" and "second" metafunctions work...

Maybe the names of the type members in "mpl::pair" should be changed from "first/second" to "first_type/second_type", because then

1. "std::pair" could be used with MPL and Fusion (*),
2. "fusion::pair" could be used with MPL, and
3. "mpl::pair" could be used as a Fusion pair, if no runtime data is required

(*) in place of a fusion::pair and not as an "adapted sequence".



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at