From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 11:50:32
On 5/8/06, Christopher Kohlhoff <chris_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> Yep, fair enough - it's probably better to be safe. Although it
> does raise the question of what to call the functions in the
> proposal for TR2. Any suggestions?
It seems to me that there were some discussion about ADL hooking
naming convention, IIRC for the range library, in this mailing list.
But I didnt read.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk