Boost logo

Boost :

From: Christopher Kohlhoff (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 07:29:56

Hi Felipe,

Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Dropping asio prefix should be thinked more carefully. While
> the default implementation wouldnt clash with user code,
> user's customization could collapse with its own free
> functions. Or even worse, asio could find through ADL
> functions that wasnt made to be allocation customization for
> asio.

Yep, fair enough - it's probably better to be safe. Although it
does raise the question of what to call the functions in the
proposal for TR2. Any suggestions?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at