From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-09 07:41:47
"Martin Wille" <mw8329_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Wil Evers wrote:
>> 4) test (please don't get me started)
>> for any reasonable degree of portability (takes over main(), maps OS
>> signals to C++ exceptions, continues to run after failing assert()s,
> FWIW, I don't use Boost.Test for the same reasons.
Could you be more elebotate? Cause none of the above seems fair. I dont know
about any portability issues related to main in static library (and it's
optional nowdays anyway). SIGNAL catching is optional and doesn't constitute
portabiltiy issues per se, whether to use it's up to you.
>> - Lots of construction/destruction ordering issues - major changes here
>> between boost-1.32 and boost-1.33.1
Alot was changed in between these releases, but I dont know about any
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk