From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-16 08:58:48
Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> It will catch up :-) On a side note, it seems the tests were run with
>> gcc 3.4. IIRC, gcc 4 and beyond introduced a couple of interesting
>> optimizations so I wonder how far do those go towards narrowing the gap.
> I would love to see better numbers for g++.
Building a later G++ under cygwin is pretty easy if you know what to
do. That's how I stay abreast of G++ developments.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk