Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-16 09:03:13

Next message: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] mpl::begin<an_integral_c> fails to compile"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] mpl::begin<an_integral_c> fails to compile"
In reply to: Tobias Schwinger: "[boost] [mpl][patch] std::pair compatiblity"
Next in thread: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] std::pair compatiblity"
Reply: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] std::pair compatiblity"

Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:

> WHAT:
> =====
>
> The patch changes the internal pair concept, so STL pairs and Fusion
> pairs also work as MPL pairs.

Is a corresponding doc change needed?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] mpl::begin<an_integral_c> fails to compile"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] mpl::begin<an_integral_c> fails to compile"
In reply to: Tobias Schwinger: "[boost] [mpl][patch] std::pair compatiblity"
Next in thread: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] std::pair compatiblity"
Reply: Tobias Schwinger: "Re: [boost] [mpl][patch] std::pair compatiblity"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk