From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-17 12:10:13
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> A draft proposal is available at
>> I've put a fair amount of thought into this proposal, and have run some
>> Subversion simulations to make sure it works smoothly.
>> What do others think?
> Mostly great. I'm concerned about these time slots. They don't seem
> necessary in principle since subversion has atomic commits, and they
> seem like they could introduce spurious lock contention on the
Any comment here? Why the time slots?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk