Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-19 08:09:21

"Matt Calabrese" <rivorus_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Well, I was bored so I put together a simple compressed_tuple anyway as an
> example of how it could be implemented fairly elegantly and account for a
> large number of elements. Right now it's set to work with up to 10 elements,
> but that can be adjusted by modifying the #define at the top. The difference
> from compressed pair is that storage is not shared if two types are used
> that are the same empty type. A get member function template is supported,
> but not a non-member version, though one could be easily added.

Ouch! Are you sure you wouldn't rather use file iteration for that?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at