Re: [boost] [array] optional constructors in Boost.Array

From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-25 17:54:15

Vincent Bherer-Roy wrote:
> On 5/25/06, AlisdairM <alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>>
>>I have been thinking this over all day, and think another class is the
>>most sensible solution - even if it means duplicating the
>>implementation.  The extra boolean value in the type is just too ugly!
>>Open to suggestions on a name though, other than array2 or arrayex <g>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Brainstorm:
> 
> constructible_array
> static_vector

Boost.Array don't have a maintainer. So I think there is an open spot.

-Thorsten