|
|
Boost : |
From: Gerhard Wesp (gwesp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 05:34:28
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:56:54PM -0400, Jarrad Waterloo wrote:
> 4) An unsigned version of the integer class that benefits from the higher
> performance of unsigned operations
I don't think the performance difference between signed and unsigned
operations would be measurable.
The other suggestions seem reasonable, though maybe not absolutely
necessary.
Regards
-Gerhard
-- Gerhard Wesp ZRH office voice: +41 (0)44 668 1878 ZRH office fax: +41 (0)44 200 1818 For the rest I claim that raw pointers must be abolished.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk