|
|
Boost : |
From: Gerhard Wesp (gwesp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 10:49:46
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:23:58PM +0200, Maarten Kronenburg wrote:
> Negating an unsigned integer with value zero is
> very legitimate.
But the value may be non-zero.
E.g.,
unsigned_integer i = 4711;
i.negate();
// i == ??
Having a method that is only defined, but a no-op, in the trivial case
defies the purpose of having a method.
Regards
-Gerhard
-- Gerhard Wesp ZRH office voice: +41 (0)44 668 1878 ZRH office fax: +41 (0)44 200 1818 For the rest I claim that raw pointers must be abolished.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk