Re: [boost] [array] optional constructors in Boost.Array

From: Vincent Bherer-Roy (vbr.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 13:48:25

On 5/26/06, Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me, though I am not quite happy with the name - a bit long?
>
> Other ideas?
>
> Paul
>

I agree this is a long name. However, I must admit I don't have any
better idea for now...

constructible_array
fixed_vector
static_vector
array_wrapper
ya_array, array2 or arrayex ;-)

The choice for a name is not easy because it is really an array. The
only difference with the old one being that it provides
constructors... so it is "constructible". Maybe an English speaking
contributor will give us a better term.

In fact this is one of the reasons I implemented this as a template
specialization in my original proposition. However, I guess there is
enough smart people here to think about a nice name.

other ideas anyone?