From: Scott McMurray (smcmurray_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-05 08:56:51
On 6/5/06, Alec Ross <alec_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> - Integer
> - Unbounded Integer // a poor second, for me
Integer might be nice, but we already have a Boost.Integer, and I'm
not sure that an "infinite precision integer" belongs in that library.
I think that unbounded is the nicest alternative so far. What about
generalizing the library name to Boost.Unbounded and possibly (later)
including a floating-point type with unbounded range and precision?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk