From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-07 12:02:11
>> Why BOOST_PQS_INT32? Doesn't the standard or Boost provide enough
>> types for this without you having to define a macro? And even if
>> not, why not use a typedef instead?
> I tried that but it wasnt acceptable as a non-type parameter IIRC.
Eh? boost::int32_t is just a typedef for ... well int on most platforms, so
sure it's usable as a non-type parameter. Using a macro for this looks just
silly to me, unless you have a concrete example that shows otherwise?