From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-09 07:06:07
Darren O'Driscoll wrote:
> However my post was more aimed at suggestions for possible
> improvements to the Boost.Random library. I notice I didn't really
> get a responce on this.
> Is that because it was all unteresting stuff / stuff which has been
> over in detail previously, or is that library now closed to changes /
Improvements are always welcome, I suggest you try contacting Jens Mauer
directly, but in any case you could package up your additions and submit
them as an extension to an existing library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk