From: Janek Kozicki (janek_listy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-12 17:06:48
Deane Yang said: (by the date of Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:11:40 -0400)
> > like this:
> > rigid_quantity , scaled_quantity , uni_quantity
> > fully_templated_quantity, partially_templated_quantity, runtime_quantity ;P
> > whatever. but not numbers :)
> No, not "whatever". It wasn't the use of numbers, per se, that everybody
> objected to. It's the desire to see meaningful names that communicate
> more clearly what the point of these things are.
bingo! When I was writing above I intended to play with the
imagination of the reader. To stimulate it ;)
it's my hope that Andy will not trade numbers for nothing. But instead
he will take something far better than numbers.
-- Janek Kozicki |
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk