Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jody Hagins (jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-13 11:56:39

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:44:25 -0400
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> environment, where I do not have time/permission to build a library
> on. Even in this scenario I would rather use included version of UTF.

I love Boost.Test, and use it religiously. However, I've always used
the lib, and never had need for the "included" feature util this past
weekend. However, I could not get it to work immediately as it seemed
to not have the same feature set. I was probably doing something wrong,
but I could not find any good docs or examples of using it (other than
to say include stuff from included directory, which seems to be a bit
scant). So, I scp-d everything to another machine which had the libs
and did my work there. However, it did remind me that you've said the
"included" variant is available, but I could not use it readily.

Could you please help me locate more detailed instructions on how to use
the "included" variant? Also, I assume compile times are longer, but
other than that, what do you lose, if anything, by using the included


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at